Of
the 7% of suits that came to trial, eighty percent (80%)
were won by the defendant (i.e. medical
provider). Defending against these lawsuits
cost Tennesseans more than $16 million a year. One-third
of the doctors polled stated that without tort reform,
they were somewhat likely or most likely to either retire
or quit.
People sometimes are jealous of doctors due to their high
rate of pay. Most people mistakenly believe that doctors
can afford to pay these extra premiums. The truth is most
doctors cannot. Due to their length of time in school and
interning, some doctors have large personal debt (i.e.
student loans, etc.). Also, the cost of maintaining an
office including paying staff and purchasing medical
equipment is high. If these doctors cannot afford to pay
all their bills by working in Tennessee, they will simply
move to states where their insurance premiums are lower.
Doctors also practice “defensive medicine.” This
occurs when extra or unnecessary tests are given to a
patient. The sole reason for these tests is that they will
help in their defense in the event of a lawsuit. It is
estimated that twenty percent (20%) of all procedures and
tests are defensive in nature. Nationally, this amounts to
ten billion dollars per year.
What are some of the statistics with regards to lawsuits
against doctors in Tennessee? Of those doctors practicing
for ten years or more:
-
70 % of all general
practitioners have been sued as well as
-
92 % of obstetricians/gynecologists (one in two have been involved in a claim in the last four years)
-
92 % of orthopedists
-
100 % of cardiac surgeons
Some
of the features of tort reform are limiting non-economic
damages (pain and suffering) to 250,000 dollars. There are
no limits on economic damages such as how much money the
person is actually out or lost future wages. Attorney’s
fees are also adjusted so that more money goes to the
victim. Frivolous lawsuit expenses will be paid by the
people who brought them. Another provision is that, in
order to testify, a person has to be certified an expert
in that field. Tennessee House Bill No. 2122 and Senate
Bill No. 2178 provided these provisions but recently were
defeated.
Texas recently passed similar tort reform and had the
following results. According to Governor Rich Perry Texas
had:
-
A 70
% decline in lawsuits against hospitals in the first 10 months after the bill had been
passed
-
More doctors coming into the state or expanding their services,
-
Malpractice premiums reduced by twenty percent from one carrier alone.
Further estimates by Texas Alliance for Patient Access shows a:
-
$48.6 million premium reduction in the first year
-
50 % reduction overall in lawsuits, and
-
3000 more doctors moving into the state.
Other
states have also seen similar results.
I believe in a person’s right to sue a doctor for
malpractice. There are some incompetent doctors out there,
but there are systems in place for weeding them out. It
would be safe to assume that not every single cardiac
surgeon is incompetent, yet all have been sued. We must
stop the practice of everyone suing their doctor if they
are not satisfied with the outcome of treatment. Some of
the responsibility lies with the patient. Real cases need
to be pursued in the Courts, not the frivolous case where
the people are simply hoping they will be paid to just “go
away.” If we do not have tort reform in Tennessee
everyone will suffer due to reduced availability of
doctors and higher medial cost.
REFERENCES:
1 Medical Liability, Reform Now or Pay Later,
http://www.mlrnow.org
To download a
printer friendly version of this page click
here.